Comments on a Paper on Alleged Misconceptions Regarding the History of Analysis: Who Has Misconceptions?

Foundations of Science 21 (3):527-532 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This comment is analysing the last section of a paper by Piotr Blaszczyk, Mikhail G. Katz, and David Sherry on alleged misconceptions committed by historians of mathematics regarding the history of analysis, published in this journal in the first issue of 2013. Since this section abounds of wrong attributions and denouncing statements regarding my research and a key publication, the comment serves to rectify them and to recall some minimal methodological requirements for historical research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Cauchy-Dirac Delta Function.Mikhail G. Katz & David Tall - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (1):107-123.
Some Misconceptions about Dispositions.David Coder - 1969 - Analysis 29 (6):200 - 202.
Misconceptions of Inference.D. G. Brown - 1954 - Analysis 15 (6):135-144.
Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science.Thomas Mormann & Mikhail Katz - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
Misconceptions of evolutionary biology and its ethical implications.Luzitano Brandão Ferreira - 2007 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 17 (1):14-15.
The Mark of Responsibility.John Gardner - 2003 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2):157-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-14

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?