Can mere phonemes be components of Millikan's substance concepts?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):83-84 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In presenting her attractive theory of concepts, Millikan makes an unwarranted assumption about the role of language in concept acquisition. The phoneme string, rather than the “word” as a semantic entity, may suffice to play the crucial role in the acquisition of substance concepts. Hence Millikan may underestimate the degree of similarity between language and other media of perception.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal concepts.Colin Allen - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):66-66.
More me? Substance concepts and self concepts.Carol Slater - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):85-85.
Are there wordlike concepts too?Christopher Gauker - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):70-71.
On sympathies with J. J. Gibson and on focusing reference.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):732-733.
Beyond substance concepts in cognitive development.Katherine Nelson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):81-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references