Common factors versus uncommon variability in comparisons of the Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (6):586-588 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03337362

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Susceptibility to optical illusions: specific or general?M. A. Tinker - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (6):593.
Illusion decrement in wings-in and wings-out Müller-Lyer figures.Maria Watson, Suzanne Greist-Bousquet & H. R. Schiffman - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (2):139-142.
The Muller-lyer illusion explained and its theoretical importance reconsidered.Bob Bermond & Jaap Heerden - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):321-338.
Another look at age trends in the Poggendorff illusion: Real or illusory?Suzanne Greist-Bousquet, Janet Davis & H. R. Schiffman - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (6):441-443.
Interactions of subjective contours with the Ponzo, Müller-Lyer, and vertical-horizontal illusions.Glenn E. Meyer - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (1):39-40.
Susceptibility to the Muller-lyer illusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrability of the visual input system.Robert N. McCauley & Joseph Henrich - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):79-101.
A relationship between apparent extent and alignment in the Poggendorff illusion.Suzanne Greist-Bousquet, H. R. Schiffman, Richard Dorsett & Janet Davis - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (6):556-558.
Explanation of the Muller-Lyer illusion: Confusion theory examined.Albert Earlebacher & Robert Sekuler - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):462.
The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults.Rudolf Pinter & Margaret M. Anderson - 1916 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 1 (3):200.
Nonequivalent roles for motor and visual feedback in the Müller-Lyer and horizontal-vertical illusions.Gary M. Brosvic, Margaret Farrelly, Edward Rebele, Donna Ribardo, Jill Gutowski, Loreen Kafer & Roberta E. Dihoff - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (1):42-44.
The destruction of the Müller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: I. An examination of two theories.Wolfgang Köhler & Julia Fishback - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (2):267.
Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Müller-Lyer illusion.Paul T. Mountjoy - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):97.
New illusory effect of the Müller-Lyer figure.Paul T. Mountjoy - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):119.
The destruction of the Müller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: II. Satiation patterns and memory traces.Wolfgang Köhler & Julia Fishback - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (3):398.
Illusions and sense-data.David H. Sanford - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):371-385.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
29 (#521,313)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A study of geometrical illusions.Charles H. Judd - 1899 - Psychological Review 6 (3):241-261.
A Study of Geometrical Illusions.C. H. Judd - 1899 - Philosophical Review 8:650.

Add more references