Collapsing functions

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (1):3-8 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We define what it means for a function on ω1 to be a collapsing function for λ and show that if there exists a collapsing function for +, then there is no precipitous ideal on ω1. We show that a collapsing function for ω2 can be added by forcing. We define what it means to be a weakly ω1-Erdös cardinal and show that in L[E], there is a collapsing function for λ iff λ is less than the least weakly ω1-Erdös cardinal. As a corollary to our results and a theorem of Neeman, the existence of a Woodin limit of Woodin cardinals does not imply the existence of precipitous ideals on ω1. We also show that the following statements hold in L[E]. The least cardinal λ with the Chang property ↠ is equal to the least ω1-Erdös cardinal. In particular, if j is a generic elementary embedding that arises from non-stationary tower forcing up to a Woodin cardinal, then the minimum possible value of j is the least ω1-Erdös cardinal

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Pathological Examples of Precipitous Ideals.Moti Gitik - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):492 - 511.
On almost precipitous ideals.Asaf Ferber & Moti Gitik - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (3):301-328.
A model with a precipitous ideal, but no normal precipitous ideal.Moti Gitik - 2013 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):1250008.
Jónsson cardinals, erdös cardinals, and the core model.W. J. Mitchell - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1065-1086.
Square in core models.Ernest Schimmerling & Martin Zeman - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):305-314.
The number of normal measures.Sy-David Friedman & Menachem Magidor - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (3):1069-1080.
Combinatorial principles in the core model for one Woodin cardinal.Ernest Schimmerling - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 74 (2):153-201.
Large cardinals and projective sets.Haim Judah & Otmar Spinas - 1997 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (2):137-155.
On the strength of no normal precipitous filter.Moti Gitik & Liad Tal - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (1-2):223-243.
More on the pressing down game.Jakob Kellner & Saharon Shelah - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (3-4):477-501.
Club guessing sequences and filters.Tetsuya Ishiu - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1037-1071.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
32 (#488,786)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On almost precipitous ideals.Asaf Ferber & Moti Gitik - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (3):301-328.
On the strength of no normal precipitous filter.Moti Gitik & Liad Tal - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (1-2):223-243.
Set forcing and strong condensation for H.Liuzhen Wu - 2015 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 80 (1):56-84.
A model with a precipitous ideal, but no normal precipitous ideal.Moti Gitik - 2013 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):1250008.
More on the pressing down game.Jakob Kellner & Saharon Shelah - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (3-4):477-501.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inner models in the region of a Woodin limit of Woodin cardinals.Itay Neeman - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 116 (1-3):67-155.

Add more references