Conceptualizing data‐deliberation: The starry sky beetle, environmental system risk, and Habermasian CSR in the digital age

Business Ethics 29 (2):303-313 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Building on an illustrative case of a systemic environmental threat and its multi‐stakeholder response, this paper draws attention to the changing political impacts of corporations in the digital age. Political Corporate Social Responsibility (PCSR) theory suggests an expanded sense of politics and corporations, including impacts that may range from voluntary initiatives to overcome governance gaps, to avoiding state regulation via corporate political activity. Considering digitalization as a stimulus, we explore potential responsibilities of corporations toward public goods in contexts with functioning governments. We show that digitalization—in the form of transparency, surveillance, and data‐sharing—offers corporations’ scope for deliberative public participation. The starry sky beetle infestation endangering public and private goods is thereby used to illustrate the possibility of expanding the political role of corporations in the digital sphere. We offer a contribution by conceptualizing data‐deliberation as a Habermasian variation of PCSR, defined as the (a) voluntary disclosure of corporate data and its transparent, open sharing with the public sector (b) along with the cooperation with governmental institutions on data analytics methods for examining large‐scale datasets (c) thereby complying with existing national and international regulations on data protection, in particular with respect to privacy and personal data.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Digital Deliberation?Chris Wisniewski - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (2):245-259.
“Conflict over risks in food production: A challenge for democracy”. [REVIEW]Karsten Klint Jensen - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3):269-283.
Raison et émotion dans la délibération.Jürg Steiner - 2011 - Archives de Philosophie 74 (2):259-274.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
The Digital Subject: People as Data as Persons.Olga Goriunova - 2019 - Theory, Culture and Society 36 (6):125-145.
The Digital Phenotype: a Philosophical and Ethical Exploration.Michele Loi - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):155-171.
Representation in digital systems.Vincent C. Müller - 2008 - In Adam Briggle, Katinka Waelbers & Brey Philip (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy. IOS Press. pp. 116-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-29

Downloads
20 (#720,454)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Seele
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (PhD)

Citations of this work

Blockchain and business ethics.Claus Dierksmeier & Peter Seele - 2019 - Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (2):348-359.
The thesis of “doux commerce” and the social licence to operate framework.Emma Borg - 2020 - Wiley-Online-Library: Business Ethics: A European Review 30 (3):412-422.
Towards the Digital Risk Society: A Review.Leif Sundberg - 2024 - Human Affairs 34 (1):151-164.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations