Common consequence effects in pricing and choice

Theory and Decision 76 (1):1-7 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study of common consequence effects in binary choice, willingness-to-pay elicitation, and willingness-to-accept elicitation. We find strong evidence in favor of the fanning out hypothesis for both WTP and WTA. In contrast, the choice data do not show a clear pattern of violations in the absence of certainty effects. Our results underline the relevance of differences between pricing and choice tasks, and their implications for models of decision making under risk.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Tarski's common concept of consequence?Ignacio Jané - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):1-42.
Regret aversion in reason-based choice.Terry Connolly & Jochen Reb - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (1):35-51.
Service variability and its consequence for pricing.S. McQuitty, E. T. Sautter, R. Oliver, E. Pratt & M. R. Hyman - forthcoming - Annual Western Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings.
Fairness of Pricing Decisions.Diana C. Robertson - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2):225-243.
On Elements of Chance.R. Duncan Luce & A. A. J. Marley - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):97-126.
Spontaneity and Freedom in Leibniz.Michael J. Murray - 2005 - In Donald Rutherford & J. A. Cover (eds.), Leibniz: Nature and Freedom. Oxford University Press. pp. 194--216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
43 (#274,068)

6 months
1 (#452,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Add more references