Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):341-347 (2009)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Buck-passers about value accept two theses about value, a negative thesis and a positive. The negative thesis is that the fact that something is valuable is not itself a reason to promote or appreciate it. The positive thesis is that the fact that something is valuable consists in the fact that there are other reasons to promote or appreciate it. Buck-passers suppose that the negative thesis follows from the positive one, and sometimes insist on it as if it is the central part of their view. But as I'll explain here, what we say about the negative thesis is orthogonal to what we say about the positive one
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2011 |
DOI | 10.1080/13869790903067725 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 19 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Normative Metaphysics for Accountants.Barry Maguire & Justin Snedegar - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (2):363-384.
View all 17 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Wrongs, Preferences, and the Selection of Children: A Critique of Rebecca Bennett's Argument Against the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.Peter N. Herissone-Kelly - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (8):447-454.
Being Positive About Negative Facts.Mark Jago & Stephen Barker - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
Reticence of Visual Phenomenal Character: A Spatial Interpretation of Transparency.Robert Schroer - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):393-414.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
201 ( #56,545 of 2,497,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,405 of 2,497,781 )
2009-01-28
Total views
201 ( #56,545 of 2,497,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,405 of 2,497,781 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads