A recipe for concept similarity

Mind and Language 22 (1):68-91 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sometimes your concept and mine have exactly the same content. When this is so, it is comparatively easy for me to understand what you say when you deploy your concept, for us to disagree, agree, and so on. But what if your concept and mine do not have exactly the same content? This question has occupied a number of philosophers, including Paul Churchland, Jerry Fodor, and Ernie Lepore. This paper develops a novel and rigorous measure of concept similarity, Proportion, such that concepts with different contents but sufficiently high Proportion scores will also conduce to understanding, agreement, and disagreement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
133 (#133,157)

6 months
19 (#121,979)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Schroeder
Rice University

Citations of this work

Measures of Similarity.Karin Enflo - 2020 - Theoria 86 (1):73-99.
Holism, conceptual role, and conceptual similarity.Joey Pollock - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (3):396-420.
Individual Conceptual Structure and Legal Experts' Efficient Communication.Jan Engberg - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):223-243.

Add more citations