Theory and Decision 66 (3):229-262 (2009)
AbstractIn this paper we experimentally investigate the disparity between willingness-to-accept (WTA) and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for risky lotteries. The direction of the income effect is reversed by endowing subjects with the highest price of a lottery when asking the WTP question. Our results show that the income effect is too small to be the only source of the disparity. Since the disparity concentrates on a subsample of subjects, parametric and nonparametric tests of the WTA-WTP ratio may lead to contradictory results. The disparity is significantly reduced when background risk is introduced. That is, putting subjects always into a risky position could improve the contingent valuation method, which is often concerned with the assessment of risky situations such as health risks, automobile safety, etc
Similar books and articles
The willingness-to-accept/willingness-to-pay disparity in repeated markets: loss aversion or 'bad-deal' aversion?Andrea Isoni - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (3):409-430.
Depth Cues Versus the Simplicity Principle in 3D Shape Perception.Yunfeng Li & Zygmunt Pizlo - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):667-685.
Future and non-future modal sentences.Tom Werner - 2006 - Natural Language Semantics 14 (3):235-255.
Perception of depth from binocular disparity.Walter C. Gogel - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):379.
The relationship between direction and amount of stimulus change and amount of perceptual disparity response.H. D. Kimmel - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (1):68.
Common ratio using delay.Manel Baucells & Franz H. Heukamp - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):149-158.
Money Does Not Induce Risk Neutral Behavior, but Binary Lotteries Do even Worse.Reinhard Selten, Abdolkarim Sadrieh & Klaus Abbink - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (3):213-252.
Aquinas and the Principle of Epistemic Disparity.Nicholas Rescher - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:29-34.
Social Justice, Health Disparities, and Culture in the Care of the Elderly.Peggye Dilworth-Anderson, Geraldine Pierre & Tandrea S. Hilliard - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):26-32.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers’ stance on paternalism. [REVIEW]Chen Li, Zhihua Li & Peter P. Wakker - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (3):297-315.
The effects of uncertainty on the WTA–WTP gap.Robert J. Reilly & Douglas D. Davis - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (2):261-272.
References found in this work
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty.Graham Loomes & Robert Sugden - 1982 - Economic Journal 92:805–24.
Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.Amos Tversky, Shmuel Sattath & Paul Slovic - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (3):371-384.
Regret in decision making under uncertainty.David E. Bell - 1982 - Operations Research 30 (5):961–81.