A Critical Review of R. L. Simon’s Contribution to the Doping in Sport Literature

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (1):115-128 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the following article, it will be argued that there are at least four clusters of arguments generally proposed to justify banning doping in sport and that Simon’s contribution has been of a seminal nature to at least two of the clusters

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Doping Is Bad In Sport Because Doping Is Bad For Sport.John William Devine - 2013 - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 43:41-43.
Genetics, bioethics and sport.Andy Miah - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):146 – 158.
Doping is a Threat to Sporting Excellence.John William Devine - 2011 - British Journal of Sports Medicine 45 (8):637-639.
Doping und die Grenzen des Leistungssports.Dr Alexander Bagattini - 2012 - Ethik in der Medizin 24 (3):207-219.
Doping and Cheating.Jan Vorstenbosch - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (2):166-181.
Coping with Doping.J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Harm, risk, and doping analogies: A counter-response to Kious.Oskar MacGregor & Mike McNamee - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):201-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-19

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations