A coherentist conception of ad hoc hypotheses

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 67:54-64 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What does it mean for a hypothesis to be ad hoc? One prominent account has it that ad hoc hypotheses have no independent empirical support. Others have viewed ad hoc judgements as subjective. Here I critically review both of these views and defend my own Coherentist Conception of Ad hocness by working out its conceptual and descriptive attractions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can A Coherentist Be An Externalist?William A. Roche - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):269-280.
Basic reasons and first philosophy: A coherentist view of reasons.Ted Poston - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):75-93.
Coherentist contraction.SvenOve Hansson - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):315-330.
Experimental Tests of Isometry Hypotheses.Roberto de Andrade Martins - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):296 - 304.
Coherentist Contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):315 - 330.
Kuhn and coherentist epistemology.Dunja Šešelja & Christian Straßer - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):322-327.
Constraints on sceptical hypotheses.James Beebe - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):449-470.
The Problem of the Criterion and Coherence Methods in Ethics.Michael R. DePaul - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):67 - 86.
Hypotheses? Forget about it!Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Philosophy Now (Jul/Aug):47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-18

Downloads
44 (#336,932)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Schindler
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

Theoretical Virtues in Scientific Practice: An Empirical Study.Moti Mizrahi - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (4):879-902.
Methodological reflections on the MOND/dark matter debate.Patrick M. Duerr & William J. Wolf - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 101 (C):1-23.
Predictivism and avoidance of ad hoc-ness: An empirical study.Samuel Schindler - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 104 (C):68-77.
The Magic of Ad Hoc Solutions.Jeroen Smid - 2023 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (4):724-741.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The methodology of scientific research programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 47 references / Add more references