Acquisition and extinction of human eyelid conditioned response as a function of schedule of reinforcement and unconditioned stimulus intensity under two masked conditioning procedures

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):398 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0035234

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):690.
Acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial and continuous reinforcement.William F. Reynolds - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (4):335.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
The influence of intensity of unconditioned stimulus upon acquisition of a conditioned response.George E. Passey - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (4):420.
Age differences in the acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Harry W. Braun & Richard Geiselhart - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (6):386.
Effects of omitted versus delayed UCS on classical eyelid conditioning under partial reinforcement.John W. Moore & Isidore Gormezano - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):248.
Effect of intertrial interval during acquisition of extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial reinforcement.David A. Grant, Lowell M. Schipper & Bruce M. Ross - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (3):203.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.Evelyn G. Walker - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (5):303.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
Effect of intermittent reinforcement on acquisition, extinction, and spontaneous recovery of the conditioned eyelid response.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2):89.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement. I. Alternation of reinforcement and the conditioned eyelid response. [REVIEW]David A. Grant, Arthur J. Riopelle & Harold W. Hake - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):53.
Effects of instructional set and UCS intensity on the latency, percentage, and form of the eyelid response.I. Gormezano & John W. Moore - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5):487.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
25 (#598,332)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references