1. The Illusory Appeal of Double Effect

In Thomas Scanlon (ed.), Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. pp. 8-36 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Danger of Double Effect.Philip A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):3-9.
Some Light on Double Effect.James G. Hanink - 1975 - Analysis 35 (5):147 - 151.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.
Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
Scanlon on the Doctrine of Double Effect.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (4):541-564.
A double dose of double effect.C. E. Kendall - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):204-205.
Scanlon on Double Effect. [REVIEW]Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):464-472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-20

Downloads
67 (#234,137)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references