Diophantine geometry from model theory

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):37-57 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

§1. Introduction. With Hrushovski's proof of the function field Mordell-Lang conjecture [16] the relevance of geometric stability theory to diophantine geometry first came to light. A gulf between logicians and number theorists allowed for contradictory reactions. It has been asserted that Hrushovski's proof was simply an algebraic argument masked in the language of model theory. Another camp held that this theorem was merely a clever one-off. Still others regarded the argument as magical and asked whether such sorcery could unlock the secrets of a wide coterie of number theoretic problems.In the intervening years each of these prejudices has been revealed as false though such attitudes are still common. The methods pioneered in [16] have been extended and applied to a number of other problems. At their best, these methods have been integrated into the general methods for solving diophantine problems. Moreover, the newer work suggests limits to the application of model theory to diophantine geometry. For example, all such known applications are connected with commutative algebraic groups. This need not be an intrinsic restriction, but its removal requires serious advances in the model theory of fields.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#171,615)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A new strongly minimal set.Ehud Hrushovski - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 62 (2):147-166.
[Omnibus Review].Anand Pillay - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):317-321.
[Omnibus Review].Ehud Hrushovski - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):710-713.

Add more references