Comment: Two Challenges for Adolphs and Andler’s Functionalist Theory of Emotions

Emotion Review 10 (3):202-203 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Adolphs and Andler’s methodological functionalism recommends that affective science focuses on what emotions do rather than on what emotions are physically constituted by or how emotions feel. In addition, it is suggested that the functional roles of emotions should be extrapolated from a set of “features” emotions intuitively appear to have. In this brief commentary, I discuss both prescriptions, focusing on the concept of function and on the role folk psychological platitudes should play in a functionalist theory of emotions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is reward an emotion?Ralph Adolphs - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):192-192.
The Neuroscience of Emotion: A New Synthesis.Ralph Adolphs - 2018 - New York, NY, USA: Princeton University Press.
Working Passions: Emotions and Creative Engagement with Value.Elisa A. Hurley - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):79-104.
Meta-emotions.Christoph Jäger & Anne Bartsch - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):179-204.
Emotion Explained.Edmund T. Rolls - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Do Emotions Cause Actions, and If So How?Andrea Scarantino - 2017 - Emotion Review 9 (4):326-334.
The Function and Intentionality of Cartesian Émotions.Abel B. Franco - 2015 - Philosophical Papers 44 (3):277-319.
Are emotions feelings?Jesse J. Prinz - 2005 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (8-10):9-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-28

Downloads
32 (#487,332)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?