Williams’ Definition of ‘X is true’

Analysis 30 (3):95-97 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX


C. J. F, Williams proposed ‘for some p ___ states that p & p’ as a satisfactory analysis of ‘___ is true’. This paper takes issue with this claim.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Being, identity, and truth.Christopher John Fardo Williams - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Anselm on truth.Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser - 2005 - In Brian Leftow & Brian Davies (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-221.
'Means of Communication as Means of Production' revisited.William Hebblewhite - 2012 - TripleC - Cognition, Communication, Co-Operation 10 (2):203-213.
Prior’s Theory of Truth.Charles Sayward - 1987 - Analysis 47 (2):83-87.
Knowledge without Truth.Priyedarshi Jetli - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:97-103.
Beyond “beyond a- and b-time”.Mikel Burley - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):411-416.
Kant on the Nominal Definition of Truth.Alberto Vanzo - 2010 - Kant Studien 101 (2):147-166.


Added to PP

70 (#219,656)

6 months
1 (#1,241,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references