Williams’ Definition of ‘X is true’
Analysis 30 (3):95-97 (1970)
Abstract
C. J. F, Williams proposed ‘for some p ___ states that p & p’ as a satisfactory analysis of ‘___ is true’. This paper takes issue with this claim.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1093/analys/30.3.95
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is Imperative Inference Impossible? The Argument from Permissive Presuppositions.Hannah Clark-Younger - 2012 - In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor.
Did Williams find the truth in relativism?Carol Rovane - 2008 - In Daniel Callcut (ed.), Reading Bernard Williams. Routledge.
Anselm on truth.Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser - 2005 - In Brian Leftow & Brian Davies (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-221.
'Means of Communication as Means of Production' revisited.William Hebblewhite - 2012 - TripleC - Cognition, Communication, Co-Operation 10 (2):203-213.
Antitheory and Edification: Williams and Kierkegaard on Some Possibilities for Philosophy.Mark A. Tietjen - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):471-486.
Knowledge without Truth.Priyedarshi Jetli - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:97-103.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-02-21
Downloads
68 (#178,299)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2011-02-21
Downloads
68 (#178,299)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
THE TRANSCENDENTAL METAPHYSIC OF G.F. STOUT: HIS DEFENCE AND ELABORATION OF TROPE THEORY.Fraser Macbride - 2014 - In A. Reboul (ed.), Mind, Value and Metaphysics: Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. Springer. pp. 141-58.
