Williams’ Definition of ‘X is true’

Analysis 30 (3):95-97 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

C. J. F, Williams proposed ‘for some p ___ states that p & p’ as a satisfactory analysis of ‘___ is true’. This paper takes issue with this claim.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm on truth.Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser - 2005 - In Brian Leftow & Brian Davies (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-221.
'Means of Communication as Means of Production' revisited.William Hebblewhite - 2012 - TripleC - Cognition, Communication, Co-Operation 10 (2):203-213.
Prior’s Theory of Truth.Charles Sayward - 1987 - Analysis 47 (2):83-87.
Knowledge without Truth.Priyedarshi Jetli - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:97-103.
Beyond “beyond a- and b-time”.Mikel Burley - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):411-416.
Kant on the Nominal Definition of Truth.Alberto Vanzo - 2010 - Kant Studien 101 (2):147-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
68 (#178,299)

6 months
1 (#450,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references