Who are my peers?: The Research Assessment Exercise in philosophy

Radical Philosophy 83 (83):2-5 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The research assessment exercise in philosophy.Sean Sayers - unknown
Lessons from the History and Philosophy of Science regarding the Research Assessment Exercise.Donald Gillies - 2007 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 61:37-73.
The Research Assessment Exercise versus Development in Higher Education: A Response to Richard Pring.Saville Kushner - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (1):5 - 8.
Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship.A. Sheikh - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):422-426.
Metrics-Based Assessments of Research: Incentives for 'Institutional Plagiarism'?Colin Berry - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):337-340.
Facilitating Ethical Reflection Among Scientists Using the Ethical Matrix.Peter Sandøe - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):425-445.
Distant Peers.Mark Vorobej - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (5):708-722.
Assessment: Summative and Formative: Some Theoretical Reflections.Maddalena Taras - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):466 - 478.
Ethical judgment in business: culture and differential perceptions of justice among Italians and Germans.Yvonne Stedham & Rafik I. Beekun - 2013 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (2):189-201.
Evidence-based assessment.John Hunsley & Eric J. Mash - manuscript
Exercise is medicine: some cautionary remarks in principle as well as in practice. [REVIEW]Ross D. Neville - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):615-622.
Understanding risks and benefits in research on reproductive genetic technologies.Janet Malek - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sean Sayers
University of Kent

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references