Philosophical Investigations 23 (1):48–53 (2000)
AbstractDoubts are raised about the claim that on mastering a finite vocabulary and a finitely stated set of rules we are prepared to understand a potential infinitude of sentences. One doubt is about understanding a potential infinitude of sentences. A second doubt is about the assumption that understanding a sentence must be a matter of figuring out its meaning from an antecedent knowledge of the meaning of its words and applying rules.
Similar books and articles
Linguistic Objectivity in Norm Sentences: Alternatives in Literal Meaning.David Duarte - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (2):112-139.
Rule-Following, Compositionality and the Normativity of Meaning.Peter Pagin - 2002 - In D. Prawitz (ed.), Meaning and Interpretation. Konferenser.
A New Look at the Problem of Rule-Following: A Generic Perspective.Kai-Yuan Cheng - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (1):1 - 21.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction, and More.Laurence Goldstein - 2004 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction. Clarendon Press. pp. 295--313.
References found in this work
No references found.