Understanding sentences

Philosophical Investigations 23 (1):48–53 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Doubts are raised about the claim that on mastering a finite vocabulary and a finitely stated set of rules we are prepared to understand a potential infinitude of sentences. One doubt is about understanding a potential infinitude of sentences. A second doubt is about the assumption that understanding a sentence must be a matter of figuring out its meaning from an antecedent knowledge of the meaning of its words and applying rules.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,466

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#296,805)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction, and More.Laurence Goldstein - 2004 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction. Clarendon Press. pp. 295--313.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references