Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection

American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):5-19 (2020)

Abstract

Although the principle of fair subject selection is a widely recognized requirement of ethical clinical research, it often yields conflicting imperatives, thus raising major ethical dilemmas regarding participant selection. In this paper, we diagnose the source of this problem, arguing that the principle of fair subject selection is best understood as a bundle of four distinct sub-principles, each with normative force and each yielding distinct imperatives: fair inclusion; fair burden sharing; fair opportunity; and fair distribution of third-party risks. We first map out these distinct sub-principles, and then identify the ways in which they yield conflicting imperatives for the design of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the recruitment of participants. We then offer guidance for how decision makers should navigate these conflicting imperatives to ensure that participants are selected fairly.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-29

Downloads
9 (#958,009)

6 months
2 (#259,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas MacKay
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Similar books and articles

Ethical Issues of Fair Subject Selection in the Research.Sifat Rahman - 2016 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):37-40.
Fair Equality of Opportunity in Global Justice.Mark Navin - 2008 - Social Philosophy Today 24:39-52.
Fairness and Fair Shares.Keith Horton - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (1):88.
Rethinking the Principle of Fair Play.Justin Tosi - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):612-631.
The Limits of Fair Equality of Opportunity.Benjamin Sachs - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):323-343.
The University and the Moral Imperative of Fair Trade Coffee.Gavin Fridell - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):141-159.
Fair Trade: An Imperfect Obligation?Nicole Hassoun - 2017 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2).