The role of object-dependent content in psychological explanation

Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):181-192 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a defence of the role of object-dependent content in psychological action. I argue against the two-list argument against object-dependent content as articulated by Noonan.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#183,310)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Sawyer
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Individualism and the mental.Tyler Burge - 1979 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):73-122.
Belief De Re.Tyler Burge - 1977 - Journal of Philosophy 74 (6):338-362.
Spreading the world.Simon Blackburn - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (3):385-387.

View all 11 references / Add more references