Headscarves: A Comparison of Public Thought and Public Policy in Germany and the Netherlands

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (4):513-530 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article focuses on public debates and public policy on the Islamic headscarf in the Netherlands and Germany. In the Netherlands the Islamic headscarf meets with an accommodating policy reaction, while in Germany some eight federal states have introduced legislation to ban the headscarf. This difference is explained, so I argue, by national differences in citizenship traditions. While the Netherlands represents a multicultural model, Germany used to be the paradigmatic example of an ethno‐cultural model of citizenship. Yet, the reaction of the German left to the headscarf, while often non‐accommodating, is very differently inspired by German history than that of the right. A commonality is that in both countries the issue is framed as a conflict between public neutrality and religious freedom, not gender equality. An effect of the focus in the debate on neutrality is that it obscures the agency of Islamic women and the gender dynamics in Islamic communities.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,441

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
Complexity, economics, and public policy.Steven N. Durlauf - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):45-75.
What is public opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):95-105.
The weight of context: Headscarves in Holland. [REVIEW]Odile Verhaar & Sawitri Saharso - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2):179-195.
Aid to Non-Public Schools.George A. Kelly - 1971 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 46 (4):485-519.
Beyond serving a purpose: additional ethical focuses for public policy agents.Vanessa Scholes - 2011 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.


Added to PP

58 (#235,536)

6 months
1 (#869,379)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations