Cézanne - Van Gogh - Monet. Genese der Abstraktion. 2. edn. Diss. Basel 1998 (2nd edition)

Heidelberg: ART-Dok (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do abstract paintings still make sense and if so what do they mean? By reducing the paintings to simple square blots as by Cézanne, to lines as by van Gogh and color traces as by Monet their meaning is fundamentally questioned. But by interpreting these compositions as effective forces or rather affective stimuli a new and different meaning becomes apparent. Landscapes are no longer introduced but made real in the aesthetic experience. Therefore aesthetics or rather aisthetics (perception) can be defined as a notion of experience and knowledge. Thus the notion of an image gets a new understanding: it can be described as an "energetic system".

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adversity and Practices of Painting.Véronique M. Fóti - 2016 - Philosophy Today 60 (2):397-405.
Cezanne's eye and Merleau-Ponty's spirit.M. Holubova - 2001 - Filozofia 56 (7):474-484.
Les constructeurs.Élie Faure - 1914 - G. Crès & Cie.
Monet: The Artist Speaks.Claude Monet - 1996 - Harper Collins.
Conversations with Cezanne.Paul Cézanne & P. M. Doran - 2001 - Univ of California Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-04

Downloads
452 (#40,468)

6 months
94 (#41,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martina Sauer
Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Semiotik

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references