Bradley’s Supposed Rejection of Subject-Predicate Judgements

Bradley Studies 4 (1):102-112 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I agree that Wollheim is wrong in his reconstruction of Bradley's arguments on Subject-Predicate judgements, but not completely. Wollheim is right about the conclusion of Bradley's arguments. I argue that Bradley does not reject subject-predicate form of judgements rather he attack's the idea that there is some judgement in which the subject is the nude reality.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maybe there are no subject-predicate sentences in chinese.Xiaoqiang Han - 2009 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (3):277-287.
No problem for Aristotle's subject and predicate.Guy Politzer - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):298-299.
Existential Assumptions for Aristotelian Logic.Phillip H. Wiebe - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:321-328.
Existential Assumptions for Aristotelian Logic.Phillip H. Wiebe - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:321-328.
Kant's aesthetics and the `empty cognitive stock'.Christopher Janaway - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):459-476.
Weak Intentionalism and the Death of the Subject.Robin Dunford - 2011 - Intellectual History Review 21 (1):43-56.
Motivational Judgement Internalism and The Problem of Supererogation.Alfred Archer - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Research 41:601-621.
The epistemic value of intuitive moral judgements.Albert W. Musschenga - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):113-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
257 (#75,836)

6 months
78 (#55,082)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references