Modality, quo vadis?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):413-414 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Grush's emulation theory comprises both modality-specific and amodal emulators. I suggest that the amodal variety be replaced by multisensory emulators. The key distinction is that multisensory processing retains the characteristics of individual sensory modalities, in contrast to amodal processing. The latter term is better reserved for conceptual and linguistic systems, rather than perception or emulation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Europe—Quo Vadis?Hans-Viktor Schierwater - 1990 - World Futures 29 (3):158-163.
Amodal imagery in rostral premotor areas.Takashi Hanakawa, Manabu Honda & Mark Hallett - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):406-407.
Two distinctions concerning emulators.Mark Wexler - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):422-422.
Representing the impossible.Jennifer Matey - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Quo vadis, systems thought?James E. Huchingson - 1985 - Zygon 20 (4):435-444.
Quo Vadis.Leo V. Ryan - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):883-893.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#1,045,260)

6 months
2 (#1,015,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references