Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):199-223 (2009)
Abstract |
While universalist theories have come under increasing attack from relativist and post-modern critics, such as Walzer, MacIntyre and Rorty, Kantian constructivism can be seen as a saviour of universalist ethics. Kantian constructivists accept the criticism that past universalist theories were foundational and philosophically comprehensive and thus contestable, but dispute that universalist principles are unattainable. The question then arises if Kantian constructivism can deliver a non-foundational justification of universal principles. Rawls, the first Kantian constructivist, has seemingly retreated from the universalist ambitions of Kantian constructivism. However, others have taken up the project of Kantian constructivism. One of them is O’Neill, who argues that she can succeed where Rawls failed and provide a truly universal non-foundational constructivism. Her requirements for such a constructivism are a constructive justification of the procedure of construction and the use of only abstract, non-ideal starting points. I will argue that O’Neill fails on both accounts. Instead of justifying the principle of practical reason constructively she gives an instrumental and therefore conditional justification. Instead of relying on purely abstract starting points her account builds on an underlying value assumption. This indicates inherent contradictions within constructivism, and might force defenders of universalism to look elsewhere to answer the relativist and post-modern critic
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1057/cpt.2008.41 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 17 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed.Carla Bagnoli - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (3):311-329.
Similar books and articles
Constructivism All the Way Down – Can O’Neill Succeed Where Rawls Failed?Kerstin Budde - 2009 - Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):199.
9 Constructivism in Rawls and Kant1.Onora O'neill - 2003 - In Samuel Richard Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press. pp. 347.
On Practical Constructivism and Reasonableness.Thomas M. Besch - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Oxford
Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed.Carla Bagnoli - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (3):311-329.
Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism: On the Epistemology of Justice.Eric Thomas Weber - 2010 - Continuum International Publishing Group.
Constructing Practical Reason: O’Neill on the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism.Thomas M. Besch - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (1):55-76.
Constructivism and Practical Reason: On Intersubjectivity, Abstraction, and Judgment.Miriam Ronzoni - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):74-104.
Conflicts of Value and the Political Ideal of Citizenship: A Defense of Political Constructivism.John R. Wright - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:167-181.
Kantian Constructivism, the Issue of Scope, and Perfectionism: O'Neill on Ethical Standing.Thomas M. Besch - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):1-20.
Kantian Constructivism and Rawlsian Egalitarianism.Alan Roy Mattlage - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-23
Total views
43 ( #261,150 of 2,498,941 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,941 )
2014-01-23
Total views
43 ( #261,150 of 2,498,941 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,941 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads