Ruse on Gay Rights and Affirmative Action

Analysis 54 (2):84 - 91 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his book Homosexuality, Michael Ruse argues that the state does not have any obligation to provide affirmative action benefits for gay people (beyond the obligation to have anti-discrimination laws). I believe that Ruse's stated reasons do not justify this conclusion. I also believe that the conception of affirmative action he deals with is far too narrow to guarantee that if there is no obligation to provide affirmative action benefits (on that narrow conception) then there is no obligation to provide positive benefits not provided to all (the wider conception of affirmative action). Moreover, I think the attempt to use the narrower, rather than the wider, conception in this case indicates a considerably less than complete sensitivity to the plight of gay people in the context of present day Western societies. In this article I attempt to justify these beliefs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
85 (#182,120)

6 months
8 (#157,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Sartorelli
Arkansas State University

Citations of this work

Affirmative action.Robert Fullinwider - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Gay Rights and Affirmative Action.Joseph Sartorelli - 1994 - Journal of Homosexuality 3 (27):179-222.

Add more references