Abstract
“He devoured her with his eyes.” This expression and many other signs point to the illusion
common to both realism and idealism: to know is to eat. After a hundred years of academicism,
French philosophy remains at that point. We have all read Brunschvicg, Lalande, and Meyerson,2
we have all believed that the spidery mind trapped things in its web, covered them with a white spit
and slowly swallowed them, reducing them to its own substance. What is a table, a rock, a house?
Answer: a certain assemblage of “contents of consciousness,” a class of such contents. Oh digestive
philosophy! Yet nothing seemed more obvious: is not the table the actual content of my perception?
Is not my perception the present state of my consciousness? Nutrition, assimilation! Assimilation,
Lalande said, of things to ideas, of ideas by ideas, of minds by minds. The corpulent skeletons of
the world were picked clean by these diligent diastases: assimilation, unification, identification.
The simplest and plainest among us vainly looked for something solid, something not just mental,
but would encounter everywhere only a soft and very genteel mist: themselves.