Do Filial Values Corrupt? How Can We Know? Clarifying and Assessing the Recent Confucian Debate

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 19 (2):193-207 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a number of papers, Liu Qingping has critiqued Confucianism’s commitment to “consanguineous affection” or filial values, claiming it to be excessive and indefensible. Many have taken issue with his textual readings and interpretive claims, but these responses do little to undermine the force of his central claim that filial values cause widespread corruption in Chinese society. This is not an interpretive claim but an empirical one. If true, it merits serious consideration. But is it true? How can we know? I survey the empirical evidence and argue that there is no stable or direct relationship between filial values and corruption. Instead, other cultural dimensions are more robust predictors of corruption. As it happens, China ranks very high in these other cultural dimensions. I conclude that if the empirical research is correct then Liu’s claims lack support.

Similar books and articles

Editor’s Word: Filial Piety: Root of Morality or Source of Corruption (I).Yong Huang - 2008 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (1):1-3.
The Reconciliation of Filial Piety and Political Authority in Early China.Soon-ja Yang - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (2):187-203.
The Virtues of Intimate Relationships.Sungwoo Um - 2019 - Dissertation, Duke University

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-20

Downloads
1,132 (#11,745)

6 months
208 (#13,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hagop Sarkissian
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.
The world of thought in ancient China.Benjamin Isadore Schwartz - 1985 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius.May Sim - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references