Analytic Controversies

In Giovanni Scarafile & Leah Gruenpeter Gold (eds.), Paradoxes of Conflict. Cham: Springer (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marcelo Dascal’s Theory Of Controversies is bundled with historical narratives, sometimes implicit, which emphasizes the role of dichotomist distinctions between Discussions and Disputes as an intermediate stepping-stone on the way to the ternary structure, which contains also Controversies. In the following paper, standard tools of the analytic trade, namely analysis of linguistic structure, are employed to propose a revised model of the dualist theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marcelo Dascal’s Theory of Controversies.Aviram Sariel - 2016 - Latest Issue of Pragmatics Cognition 23 (3):437-460.
Controversies and Epistemology.Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:159-192.
Controversies and the Becomin g of Physical Chemistry.Kostas Gavroglu - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
1 (#1,884,204)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references