- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why not all evidence is scientific evidence
Episteme 15 (2):209-227 (2018)
Abstract
Data which constitute satisfactory evidence in other contexts are sometimes not treated as valid evidence in the context of scientic conrmation. I give a justicatory explanation of this fact, appealing to the incentives, biases, and social situatedness of scientistsAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Scientific disagreements and the diagnosticity of evidence: how too much data may lead to polarization.Matteo Michelini, Osorio Javier, Wybo Houkes, Dunja Šešelja & Christian Straßer - forthcoming - Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (4).
General relativity and the standard model: Why evidence for one does not disconfirm the other.Nicholaos Jones - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):124-132.
Introduction: Evidence and Causality in the Sciences.Phyllis Illari & Federica Russo - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):293-294.
Three Criteria for Consensus Conferences.Jacob Stegenga - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):35-49.
Fact, Theory, and Hypothesis: Including the History of the Scientific Fact.Stephen Turner - 2007 - In G. Ritzer, J. M. Ryan & B. Thorn, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (1st Ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1554-1557.
Legal evidence and knowledge.Georgi Gardiner - 2023 - In Maria Lasonen-Aarnio & Clayton Littlejohn, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-04-05
Downloads
91 (#248,865)
6 months
15 (#217,500)
2017-04-05
Downloads
91 (#248,865)
6 months
15 (#217,500)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
On IQ and other sciencey descriptions of minds.Devin Sanchez Curry - forthcoming - Philosophers' Imprint.
How scientific psychology shapes minds.Devin Sanchez Curry - forthcoming - In Tad Zawidzki, Routledge Handbook of Mindshaping.
Let’s not agree to disagree: the role of strategic disagreement in science.Carlos Santana - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6159-6177.
References found in this work
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
The communication structure of epistemic communities.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):574-587.
Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences.Gerd Gigerenzer & Henry Brighton - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1):107-143.
The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions.John Dupre & Philip Kitcher - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):147.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-db4gm uwo