Why citizen review might beat peer review at identifying pursuitworthy scientific research

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92 (C):20-26 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.01.012

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

No Peeking: Peer Review and Presumptive Blinding.Nathan Ballantyne & Jared Celniker - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-14.
Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin - 2013 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.
Responsibility, Expertise and Trust: Institutional Ethics Committees and Science.Suzanne Uniacke - 2015 - Humana Mente 8 (28):169-185.
Regulation of science by ‘Peer review’.Malcolm Atkinson - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (2):147-158.
Some Opinions on the Review Process of Research Papers Destined for Publication.Ehsan Roohi & Omid Mahian - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):809-812.
Psychical research in the history and philosophy of science. An introduction and review.Andreas Sommer - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48:38-45.
Advances in peer review research: an introduction.Arthur E. Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
The wages of sin.E. L. Pattullo - 1985 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 7 (5):7-8.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Essay review: Why Can't Science Be More Like History: A Response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique. [REVIEW]Dr James Nikopoulos - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 75:57-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
37 (#685,642)

6 months
8 (#533,264)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carlos Santana
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Bias, Lotteries, and Affirmative Action in Science Funding Policy.Jamie Shaw - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rational endorsement.Will Fleisher - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (10):2649-2675.
The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.Michael Strevens - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):55-79.

View all 13 references / Add more references