The Demise of the Incommensurability Thesis

In Moti Mizrahi (ed.), The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 75-91 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper briefly reviews the main formulations of the incommensurability thesis by Feyerabend and Kuhn, as well as the main criticisms leveled against it. The question is then raised of whether there is a "phenomenon" of incommensurability that has been "discovered". It is argued that there is no such phenomenon.

Similar books and articles

Scientific realism and the semantic incommensurability thesis.Howard Sankey - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):196-202.
Taxonomic incommensurability.Howard Sankey - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):7 – 16.
Incommensurability and the indeterminacy of translation.Howard Sankey - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):219 - 223.
Book review of Howard Sankey The Incommensurability Thesis. [REVIEW]Dudley Shapere - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):139-141.
Incommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories: Response to Mizrahi.Lydia Patton - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (7):51-58.
The Incommensurability Thesis.Howard Sankey - 1994 - Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
Kuhn's changing concept of incommensurability.Howard Sankey - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (4):759-774.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-18

Downloads
325 (#59,679)

6 months
77 (#55,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references