Stories without Significance in the Discourse of Breast Reconstruction

Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (3):326-344 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Breast reconstruction is an everyday, apparently nonviolent, even benevolent, remaking of the normal, and the reasons for why reconstruction is motivated and legitimate are uncontroversial and widely accepted. In this article the author will, through Donna Haraway's way of conceptualizing discourses, analyze what she calls “stories without significance.” The author has mapped the stories and interpretations of women undergoing reconstruction, stories that are not becoming part of the monovocal discourse of breast reconstruction. Thus, she focuses on the things said that are not assigned significance, the silences and impossibilities. The article is also an effort to account for some of the invisible work that goes into the process of breast reconstruction in dialogue with the feminist field of science and technology studies. This to explore the making of the normal in a medical practice and reflect on how modest interventions could be made.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The value of narrative practices in pastoral conversations.Nicole Dickson - 2013 - Dissertation, University of South Africa
"You Had to Be There" : The Problem With Reporter Reconstructions.Russell Frank - 1999 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (3):146-158.
No reconstruction, no impenetrability (at least not much).Shimon Edelman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):376-376.
Thoughts on a Possible Rational Reconstruction of the Method of “Rational Reconstruction”.Gregg Alan Davia - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 37:44-50.
Theorie unter dem non-statement view und der kuhnsche wissenschaftler.Michael Küttner - 1981 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 12 (1):163-177.
Breast cancer incidence: what do the figures mean?Ann Johnson & Jane Shekhdar - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (1):27-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Uneasy Listening. [REVIEW]Kathy Davis - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 26 (3):42-42.

Add more references