On ‘cuteness’

British Journal of Aesthetics 31 (4):162-165 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Morreall argues that “ . . . cuteness was probably essential in human evolution” because “ . . . our emotional and behavioral response . . . to cute things . . . has had survival value for the human race.” Cuteness, for Morreall, is an abstract general attribute of infants that causes adults to want to care for them (or which is the reason, or at least an important reason, for such solicitousness). I try to show that this is, if not an altogether fallacious way of explaining the matter, at least an extremely misleading one.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On ‘cuteness’.John T. Sanders - 1992 - British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (2):162-165.
The Contingency Of Cuteness: A REPLY TO SANDERS.John Morreall - 1993 - British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (3):283-285.
Cuteness.John Morreall - 1991 - British Journal of Aesthetics 31 (1):39-47.
The Cuteness of the Avant‐Garde.Sianne Ngai - 2005 - Critical Inquiry 31 (4):811.
Our aesthetic categories: zany, cute, interesting.Sianne Ngai - 2012 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
337 (#56,950)

6 months
33 (#98,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John T. Sanders
Rochester Institute of Technology

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references