Joao Fabiano
Harvard University
How individuals tend to evaluate the combination of their own and other’s payoffs—social value orientations—is likely to be a potential target of future moral enhancers. However, the stability of cooperation in human societies has been buttressed by evolved mildly prosocial orientations. If they could be changed, would this destabilize the cooperative structure of society? We simulate a model of moral enhancement in which agents play games with each other and can enhance their orientations based on maximizing personal satisfaction. We find that given the assumption that very low payoffs lead agents to be removed from the population, there is a broadly stable prosocial attractor state. However, the balance between prosociality and individual payoff-maximization is affected by different factors. Agents maximizing their own satisfaction can produce emergent shifts in society that reduce everybody’s satisfaction. Moral enhancement considerations should take the issues of social emergence into account.
Keywords moral enhancement  social value orientation  selfishness  game theory  altruism  computer simulation  emergence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180116001109
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement.Joao Fabiano - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2-3):89-102.
The Gene-Editing of Super-Ego.Bjørn Hofmann - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (3):295-302.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
Complex Dynamics and the Social Sciences.Ralph Abraham - 1987 - World Futures 23 (1):1-10.
Three Concepts of Political Stability: An Agent-Based Model.Kevin Vallier - 2017 - Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (1):232-259.
Is Human Enhancement a Threat to Solidarity?Ruud ter Meulen - 2017 - Acta Philosophica 26 (2):307-322.
Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility.John Danaher - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):359-378.
A Critique of Moral Education in the Social Studies.Richard M. Merelman - 1979 - Journal of Moral Education 8 (3):182-192.
Thinking Across Species—a Critical Bioethics Approach to Enhancement.Richard Twine - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.
Enhancement and Equality.Greg Bognar - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):11-32.


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #253,294 of 2,517,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,427 of 2,517,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes