- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Group-level traits are not units of selection
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):271-272 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Strong group-level traits and selection-transmission thickets.Jeffrey C. Schank - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):272-273.
Clarifying the time frame and units of selection in the cultural group selection hypothesis.Andrew Whiten & David Erdal - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
Emergent group traits, reproduction, and levels of selection.Samir Okasha - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):268-269.
Tackling group-level traits by starting at the start.Maciej Chudek & Joseph Henrich - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):256-257.
Coordination, cooperation, and the ontogeny of group-level traits.Timothy Michael Waring & Sandra Hughes Goff - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):278-279.
Many important group-level traits are institutions.Matthew R. Zefferman & Peter J. Richerson - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):280-281.
Cultural evolution and emergent group-level traits through social heterosis.Peter Nonacs & Karen M. Kapheim - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):266-267.
The primacy of scaffolding within groups for the evolution of group-level traits.Linnda R. Caporael & Colin K. Garvey - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):255-256.
Group-level traits can be studied with standard evolutionary theory.Thomas C. Scott-Phillips & Thomas E. Dickins - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):273-274.
Studying the emergence of complicated group-level cultural traits requires a mathematical framework.Michael Doebeli & Burton Simon - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):258-259.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-09-23
Downloads
74 (#308,776)
6 months
9 (#455,646)
2014-09-23
Downloads
74 (#308,776)
6 months
9 (#455,646)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
The economic origins of ultrasociality.John Gowdy & Lisi Krall - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-63.
References found in this work
Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence.William C. Wimsatt - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):372-84.
Units of evolution: a metaphysical essay.David L. Hull - 1981 - In Uffe Juul Jensen & Rom Harré, The Philosophy of evolution. New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 23--44.
Emergence as non-aggregativity and the biases of reductionisms.William C. Wimsatt - 2000 - Foundations of Science 5 (3):269-297.
The Philosophy of evolution.Uffe Juul Jensen & Rom Harré (eds.) - 1981 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo