Ethical limits to domestication

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (2):114-122 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Through the process of domestication the genetic make-up of farm animals can be changed by means of either selective breeding or genetic engineering. This paper is about the ethical limits to such genetic changes. It is suggested that the ethical significance of domestication has become clear recently in the light of genetic engineering, but that the problem has been there all along. Two ethical approaches to domestication are presented, genetic integrity and animal welfare. It is argued that the welfare approach is superior. Finally, five ethical hypotheses based on the welfare approach are presented

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic engineering and the integrity of animals.Rob De Vries - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):469-493.
Biocentrism and Genetic Engineering.Andrew Dobson - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (3):227-239.
The concept of intrinsic value and transgenic animals.H. Verhoog - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):147-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
30 (#517,657)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Peter Sandøe
University of Copenhagen
Nils Holtug
University of Copenhagen

References found in this work

On telos and genetic manipulation.Bernard Rollin - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (2):11.

Add more references