Phenomenology and Mind 19 (19):150 (2020)
AbstractBackground. Since the nineties, policymakers and theorists working across several disciplines started to entertain the notion of directly engaging the public in matters of public concern. Accompanying this was the attempt to resort to deliberative democracy in order to make such an involvement effective. Seizing on its intrinsic dialogic nature, some scholars proposed the application of public deliberation to the realm of public bioethics. Drawing upon the theory and practice of deliberative public bioethics, the purpose of this paper is to shed light onto the figure of the bioethical expert and its role in public bioethics, and relatedly, to investigate how deliberation may be implemented in a public bioethics context. Methods. We set up a large-scale experiment to investigate whether, and to what extent, different moderation styles impact on participants’ moral preferences. The study combines a survey of a representative sample of the general population with a laboratory experiment based on a random sample of students that ex-ante has identical attitudes to the general population.Results. Findings show that: i) different moderation styles can significantly influence deliberative outcomes; iii) the effects of deliberation are not necessarily immediate, but may be revealed after the end of deliberative session; iii) participants tend to better appreciate a bioethical expert acting as “passive moderator”, namely as someone who acts in order to ensure non-domination and non-interference, thus allowing the creation of basic conditions for equality within the deliberative setting.Conclusions. Our experiment represents an example of how deliberation can be employed in public bioethics.
Similar books and articles
Public health agencies’ obligations and the case of Zika.Florencia Luna - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (8):575-581.
Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction.M. Parker - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):160-165.
Creating a stem cell donor: A case study in reproductive genetics.Jeffrey P. Kahn & Anna C. Mastroianni - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):81-96.
Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme.Hylke Jellema, Swanny Kremer, Anne‐Ruth Mackor & Bert Molewijk - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):277-285.
Public justification versus public deliberation: the case for divorce.Kevin Vallier - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):139-158.
Genetics and Human Behaviour the Ethical Context.B. A. Nuffield Council on Bioethics & Hepple - 2002
Moral Philosophy and Public Policy: The Case of New Reproductive Technologies.Will Kymlicka - 1996 - In L. Wayne Sumner & Joseph Boyle (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics. University of Toronto Press. pp. 244-270.
Worldwide deliberation and public use of reason online.May Thorseth - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252.
Kant’s ‘formula of humanity’ and assisted reproductive technology: a case for duties to future children.Tatiana Patrone - 2017 - Monash Bioethics Review 34 (3-4):206-225.
Bioethics and Religion: Some Implications for Reproductive Medicine.Clara Mironiuc, Nicolae Ovidiu Grad, Horațiu Silaghi, Alina Cristina Silaghi & Ion Aurel Mironiuc - 2017 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 16 (47):90-103.
Precaution, threshold risk and public deliberation.Sune Holm - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (2):254-260.
On Democratic Deliberation in Bioethics.Aikaterini A. Aspradaki - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:15-19.
A Systematic Review on Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Stigma in the United States: Lessons for HIV Care in Pregnancy From Reproductive Genetics.Barbara Wilkinson & Kavita Shah Arora - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (2):142-154.
Opportunities and Challenges in the Use of Public Deliberation to Inform Public Health Policies.Julia Abelson - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):24-25.
P7. Attitudes toward Molecular Genetics Predictive Testing: Case Study of Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy in Kyushu, Japan.Asian Bioethics Poster Session - forthcoming - Bioethics in Asia: The Proceedings of the Unesco Asian Bioethics Conference (Abc'97) and the Who-Assisted Satellite Symposium on Medical Genetics Services, 3-8 Nov, 1997 in Kobe/Fukui, Japan, 3rd Murs Japan International Symposium, 2nd Congress of the Asi.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads