Did Alexander Fleming Deserve the Nobel Prize?

Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):899-919 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Penicillin is a serendipitous discovery par excellence. But, what does this say about Alexander Fleming’s praiseworthiness? Clearly, Fleming would not have received the Nobel Prize, had not a mould accidently entered his laboratory. This seems paradoxical, since it was beyond his control. The present article will first discuss Fleming’s discovery of Penicillin as an example of moral luck in science and technology and critically assess some common responses to this problem. Second, the Control Principle that says that people are not responsible for things beyond their control will be defended. An implication of this principle is that Alexander Fleming’s desert, which is based on his epistemic skills, remains untouched by luck. Third, by distinguishing different notions of praiseworthiness, a way to resolve the paradox of moral luck will be elaborated. Desert provides only a pro tanto reason to determine whether someone is an appropriate addressee of reward. Here, luck can make a difference. Forth, it will be argued that stimulating the quest for socially beneficial science provides a compelling reason to treat scientists with equal desert differently. Penicillin provides striking evidence for the importance of this quest and showcasing it incentivizes the making of socially beneficial science. Ultimately, it will be justified why Fleming deserved the Nobel Prize in at least one sense of the concept.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Oswald T. Avery: Nobel Laureate or Noble Luminary?Frank Portugal - 2010 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):558-570.
The Economic Nobel Prize.Nikolay Gertchev - 2011 - Libertarian Papers 3:9.
Excellence and Chance: The Nobel Prize Case of E. von Behring and É. Roux.Franz Luttenberger - 1996 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18 (2):225 - 239.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-01

Downloads
11 (#975,863)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Sand
Delft University of Technology

References found in this work

Two Faces of Responsibility.Gary Watson - 1996 - Philosophical Topics 24 (2):227-248.
Moral Luck.B. A. O. Williams & T. Nagel - 1976 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 50:115 - 151.
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (1):96-99.
The force and fairness of blame.Pamela Hieronymi - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):115–148.

View all 45 references / Add more references