Metascience 24 (2):265-269 (2015)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Traditional epistemology is haunted by the spectre of scepticism. Yet the more pressing concern in the contemporary intellectual scene must surely be relativism rather than scepticism. This has been the case in the history and philosophy of science since the work of Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend, to say nothing of the emergence of the sociology of scientific knowledge. In Epistemic Relativism: A Constructive Critique, Markus Seidel comes firmly to grips with this modern spectre. Though Seidel devotes attention to other forms of relativism, the primary focus of the book is epistemic relativism, which he understands to be relativism about epistemic justification. Relativist or relativist-tending authors such as Kuhn, Nelson Goodman, Martin Kusch, Richard Rorty and Peter Winch receive some discussion . But Seidel takes as his main relativist target the work of the founding figures of the Edinburgh “strong programme”, Barry Barnes and David Bloor. While ..
|
Keywords | Seidel relativism strong programme |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11016-014-9972-x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
What is Justified Belief?Alvin Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
How the Epistemic Relativist May Use the Sceptic’s Strategy: A Reply to Markus Seidel.Howard Sankey - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):140-144.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How the Epistemic Relativist May Use the Sceptic’s Strategy: A Reply to Markus Seidel.Howard Sankey - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):140-144.
Between Relativism and Absolutism? – The Failure of Kuhn’s Moderate Relativism.Markus Seidel - 2013 - Was Dürfen Wir Glauben? Was Sollen Wir Tun? Sektionsbeiträge des Achten Internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft Für Analytische Philosophie E.V.
Scepticism, Relativism and the Argument From the Criterion.Howard Sankey - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
Epistemic Relativism and the Problem of the Criterion.Howard Sankey - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):562-570.
“Is Relativism Self-Defeating?”.Harold Zellner - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:287-295.
Methodological Incommensurability and Epistemic Relativism.Howard Sankey - 2013 - Topoi 32 (1):33-41.
Scepticism, Relativism and a Naturalistic Particularism.Howard Sankey - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (4):395-412.
A Critique of Relativism in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.Si Sun - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):115-130.
Relativism, Particularism and Reflective Equilibrium.Howard Sankey - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (2):281-292.
On Relativism and Pluralism: Response to Steven Bland.Howard Sankey - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:98-103.
Relativism for Philosophers and Sociologists: Richard Schantz and Markus Seidel : The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of Knowledge. Frankfurt: Ontos, 2011, 235pp, €89.00 HB.Tamás Demeter - 2013 - Metascience 22 (2):475-479.
The Case Against Epistemic Relativism: Reflections on Chapter 6 of F Ear of Knowledge.Gideon Rosen - 2007 - Episteme 4 (1):10-29.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-12-30
Total views
143 ( #80,501 of 2,497,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,700 of 2,497,778 )
2014-12-30
Total views
143 ( #80,501 of 2,497,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,700 of 2,497,778 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads