Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation

Mind and Language 17 (1-2):188–206 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The contribution that a word makes to the meaning and interpretation of a sentence depends upon access to its meaning, and to general knowledge associated with the word. Evidence is presented to support the argument that accessing lexical meaning, as with general knowledge, is a graded affair. We argue that the contribution a word makes depends upon its relevance to the context, and to focus and related variables. Extensions of the argument are made to other aspects of language processing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classification and interpretation.Andreas Baudisch - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):138-159.
Interpretation in the natural sciences.Jan Faye - 2010 - In Dorato Mauro, Miklós Rédei & Mauricio Suárez (eds.), EPSA Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Launch of the European Philosophy of Sciences Association. Vol. 1-2. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 107-117.
Order-independence and Underspecification.Reinhard Muskens - 2004 - In Hans Kamp & Barbara Hall Partee (eds.), Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning. Elsevier. pp. 11--239.
Semantic interpretation and the resolution of ambiguity.Graeme Hirst - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#410,354)

6 months
6 (#349,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?