Sartre Studies International 26 (1):38-60 (2020)

Abstract
I have two aims: to analyze Jonathan Webber’s analysis of bad faith and compare it to my own, traditional, account and to show that Webber’s focus on character, as a set of dispositions or character traits that incline but do not determine us to view the world and behave in certain ways, contributes further to understanding Sartre’s ‘bad faith’. Most Sartre scholars have ignored any emphasis on ‘character’. What is distinctive and emphatic in Webber’s interpretation is his insistence ‘on bad faith’ as a ‘social disease’ distorting the way one views, interprets, and even thinks about the world.. But, again, this pattern is not deterministic. Early in his work, Webber tells us that Sartre does not claim that we have bad faith by ‘ascribing character traits where there are none but by pretending to ourselves that we have ‘fixed natures’ that e.g. preclude the behaviour or character trait of which one is being accused.Though hardly disagreeing radically with Webber I do offer critical considerations. While Webber focuses on character, I focus on Sartre’s contention that the ‘most basic’ or ‘first act’ of bad faith is ‘to flee from what [the human being] cannot flee, from what it is’, specifically human freedom. And I disagree partially with Webber’s articulation of the ‘spirit of seriousness’, and strongly with both Sartre’s and his supporting claim that bad faith cannot be cynical. I also demur from Webber’s overemphasis on the ‘social’. For me, the root of all bad faith is our primitive ontological condition; namely, that at its very ‘upsurge’, human reality, anguished by its ‘reflective apprehension’ of its freedom and lack of Being, is disposed to flee from its nothingness in pursuit of identity, substantiality - in short, Being.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3167/ssi.2020.260105
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,714
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Existentialism.Jonathan Webber - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Is Bad Faith Necessarily Social?Ronald Santoni - 2008 - Sartre Studies International 14:23-39.
Is Bad Faith Necessarily Social?Ronald E. Santoni - 2008 - Sartre Studies International 14 (2):23-39.
Motivated Aversion: Non-Thetic Awareness in Bad Faith.Jonathan Webber - 2002 - Sartre Studies International 8 (1):45-57.
Motivated Aversion: Non-Thetic Awareness in Bad Faith.Jonathan Webber - 2002 - Sartre Studies International 8:45-57.
Sartre's Theory of Character.Jonathan Webber - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):94-116.
Bad Faith Good Faith.Ronald Santoni - 1995 - Temple University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-24

Total views
23 ( #480,420 of 2,462,601 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #179,038 of 2,462,601 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes