The Logic of What Might Have Been

Philosophical Review 98 (1):3-34 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dogma that the propositional logic of metaphysical modality is S5 is rebutted. The author exposes fallacies in standard arguments supporting S5, arguing that propositional metaphysical modal logic is weaker even than both S4 and B, and is instead the minimal and weak metaphysical-modal logic T.

Similar books and articles

Reflexivity.Nathan Salmon - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (3):401-429.
Logic, Logic, and Logic.George Boolos - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey.
Introduction to neutrosophic logic.Charles Ashbacher - 2002 - Rehoboth, NM: American Research Press.
Computational logic.Nathan P. Levin - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):167-172.
Logic for computer scientists.Uwe Schöning - 1989 - Boston: Birkhäuser.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
467 (#39,502)

6 months
119 (#30,264)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Salmón
University of California at Santa Barbara

Citations of this work

Modal science.Timothy Williamson - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):453-492.
The Broadest Necessity.Andrew Bacon - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (5):733-783.
How to Be a Spacetime Substantivalist.Trevor Teitel - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy 119 (5):233-278.

View all 113 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic.Saul Kripke - 1963 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 16:83-94.
Identity and necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1971 - In Milton Karl Munitz (ed.), Identity and individuation. New York,: New York University Press. pp. 135-164.
Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic.David Lewis - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (5):113-126.
Theories of actuality.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1974 - Noûs 8 (3):211-231.
Possible worlds.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1976 - Noûs 10 (1):65-75.

View all 46 references / Add more references