- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
From “How” to “Why”: Reasons for Magnifying and Marginalizing Voices in Pediatric Decision-Making
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):19-21 (2022)
Abstract
In “Acquiescence is Not Agreement,” Caruso Brown (2022) offers a comprehensive framework for identifying and empowering marginalized voices in pediatric decision-making. She does so through both a...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
When Parents Prefer to Defer: Is ‘Deferral’ Always Problematic in Pediatric Decision-Making?Bryanna Moore, Georgia Loutrianakis & Johnna Wellesley - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):24-26.
Blood is Thicker than Water, or is It? The Possible Role of Stepparents in Pediatric Decision Making.Jaan Toelen, Ingrid Boone, Jan Van Bavel & Kris Dierickx - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):29-30.
Permission to Speak? Voices in Pediatric Decision Making.Aviva L. Katz & Sally A. Webb - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):15-17.
How We Found Consensus on Pediatric Decision-Making and Why It Matters.Erica K. Salter, Lainie Friedman Ross & D. Micah Hester - 2024 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 67 (2):186-196.
Acquiescence is Not Agreement: The Problem of Marginalization in Pediatric Decision Making.Amy E. Caruso Brown - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):4-16.
A Framework for Evaluating a Minor's Involvement in Medical Decision Making.Donna L. Snyder & Robert M. Nelson - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):10-12.
Voice, Vulnerability and Dependency of the Child: Guiding Concepts for Shared-Decision Making.Christina Lamb - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):34-36.
Supporting Marginalized Decision-Maker’s Autonomy(ies).Armand H. Matheny Antommaria & Elizabeth Lanphier - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):22-24.
Altruism and Pediatric Oncology Trials: It Does Not Tip the Decision-Making Scales.Katherine Wasson - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):48-48.
Emotion as a Signpost in Complicated Pediatric Decision-Making.Wynne Morrison - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):17-19.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-05-27
Downloads
21 (#884,104)
6 months
4 (#1,151,070)
2022-05-27
Downloads
21 (#884,104)
6 months
4 (#1,151,070)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
Acquiescence is Not Agreement: The Problem of Marginalization in Pediatric Decision Making.Amy E. Caruso Brown - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):4-16.
Toward a Coherent Account of Pediatric Decision Making.Ana S. Iltis - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552.
[Book review] children, families, and health care decision making. [REVIEW]Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Ethics 112 (3):639-641.
Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard. [REVIEW]Erica K. Salter - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (3):179-198.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5d8df9484f-nsbkm uwo