Quotation and Conceptions of Language

Dialectica 65 (2):205-220 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses empty quotation (‘’ is an empty string) and lexical quotation (his praise was, quote, fulsome, unquote), it challenges the minimal theory of quotation (‘ “x” ’ quotes ‘x’) and it defends the identity theory of quotation. In the process it illuminates disciplinary differences between the science of language and the philosophy of language. First, most philosophers assume, without argument, that language includes writing, whereas linguists have reason to identify language with speech (plus sign language). Second, philosophers tend to think of languages as abstract objects whereas linguists tend to think of them as natural objects. These foundational differences help to explain disagreements in grammaticality judgments and consequent disagreements in semantic theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-24

Downloads
92 (#132,344)

6 months
2 (#279,211)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Saka
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

Citations of this work

Quotation.Herman Cappelen & Ernest Lepore - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Quotation.Paul Saka - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):935-949.
Pure Quotation, Metalanguage and Metasemantics.André Bazzoni - 2016 - Linguistics and Philosophy 39 (2):119-149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ways of Worldmaking.Nelson Goodman - 1978 - Harvester Press.
Semantics And Cognition.Ray S. Jackendoff - 1983 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Formal Philosophy. [REVIEW]Richard Montague - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):573-578.
Language as a Natural Object.Noam Chomsky - 2000 - In New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 106--133.

View all 32 references / Add more references