The Strength of Relationships

Stance 3:33-38 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I endeavor to show that Descartes’ attribute-mode distinction cannot be characterized in terms of the determinable-determinate relation. I identify the latter’s formal and modal properties in order to determine whether the former shares them, which ultimately shows distinctness. I then indicate which property accounts for the differences. I conclude that the relation that unites modes under an attribute is weaker than that which groups determinates under some determinable, respectively, the relations of inherence and incompatibility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Determinables and Brute Similarities.Olivier Massin - 2013 - In Christer Svennerlind, Jan Almäng & Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (eds.), Johanssonian Investigations. Essays in Honour of Ingvar Johansson on His Seventieth Birthday. Ontos Verlag.
Realization, determination, and mechanisms.Matthew C. Haug - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (3):313-330.
Fundamental determinables.Jessica M. Wilson - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
Breaking the law of desire.Joshua Gert - 2005 - Erkenntnis 62 (3):295-319.
Determinates vs. determinables.David H. Sanford - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Natural Properties and Bottomless Determination.Bence Nanay - 2014 - Americal Philosophical Quarterly 51:215-226.
On Logical Strength and Weakness.Chris Mortensen & Tim Burgess - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):47-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
28 (#555,203)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Said Saillant
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references