The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature: Western and Japanese Perspectives and Their Ethical Implications

Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We often derive aesthetic pleasure from nature as well as from works of art. Although our experiences of both are analogous in some respects, there are some important differences. Since nature is not created specifically for aesthetic enjoyment it can be appreciated in more various ways than art. Hence, the distinction between aesthetic and non-aesthetic experience is crucial in examining the aesthetic appreciation of nature. ;An appreciation of any object is considered aesthetic if it is directed toward the sensuous surface of the object for its own sake. This notion of the aesthetic, however, does not necessarily preclude the aesthetic relevance of various conceptual considerations. Examples are provided to illustrate how associated facts can modify our perception of the object's sensuous surface. Thus, a variety of aesthetic appreciations of the same object are possible. ;Among various possible appreciations of an artwork, the range of appropriate responses is limited by cultural, historical, and institutional determinations. In contrast, nature lacks such determinations; consequently, aesthetic considerations in most cases cannot show that certain responses toward nature are inappropriate. Neither can we claim that certain aesthetic responses toward nature are improper because they do not help justify the preservation of nature, hence are ethically undesirable. An aesthetic justification for preserving nature, therefore, presupposes its ethical justification. ;Contrary to a widely held view, such ethical considerations against destroying nature are not suggested by the traditional Japanese love of nature. The Japanese traditionally have appreciated nature for its psychological, aesthetic, and metaphysical values and thus their love toward nature lacks an ethical dimension. I suggest instead that the most fundamental reason for preserving nature concerns its functional unity which is indispensable to our health and survival. In this sense, the aesthetic appreciation of nature that incorporates the scientific considerations regarding such unity helps us develop an ecologically sensitive attitude toward nature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature and Environmentalism.Allen Carlson - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:137-155.
The aesthetic appreciation of nature.Malcolm Budd - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):207-222.
Everyday Aesthetics.Yuriko Saito - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Epistemic Norms, Moral Norms, and Nature Appreciation.Robert Stecker - 2012 - Environmental Ethics 34 (3):247-264.
VIIā€”The Aesthetics of Nature.Malcom Budd - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):137-157.
The Aesthetic Significance of Nature's Otherness.Marianne O'brien - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (1):99-111.
The Aesthetic Significance of Nature's Otherness.Marianne O' Brien - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (1):99 - 111.
Appreciating Nature on Its Own Terms.Yuriko Saito - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):135-149.
Objectivity and the aesthetic value of nature: Reply to Parsons.Malcolm Budd - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):267-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
3 (#1,686,544)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references