Chisholm's Paradox and Conditional Oughts

Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8554:192-207 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since it was presented in 1963, Chisholm’s paradox has attracted constant attention in the deontic logic literature, but without the emergence of any definitive solution. We claim this is due to its having no single solution. The paradox actually presents many challenges to the formalization of deontic statements, including (1) context sensitivity of unconditional oughts, (2) formalizing conditional oughts, and (3) distinguishing generic from nongeneric oughts. Using the practical interpretation of ‘ought’ as a guideline, we propose a linguistically motivated logical solution to each of these problems, and explain the relation of the solution to the problem of contrary-to-duty obligations.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dynamic Thoughts on Ifs and Oughts.Malte Willer - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14:1-30.
Ifs and Oughts.Niko Kolodny & John MacFarlane - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):115-143.
A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox.Marcelo Esteban Coniglio & Newton Marques Peron - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (3):299-326.
On Chisholm's paradox.Peter L. Mott - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (2):197 - 211.
The paradox of indicative conditionals.D. K. Johnston - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 83 (1):93 - 112.
Changing the modal context.John Cantwell - 2008 - Theoria 74 (4):331-351.
Detaching if-clauses from should.Ana Arregui - 2010 - Natural Language Semantics 18 (3):241-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-15

Downloads
890 (#15,154)

6 months
94 (#39,786)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Catharine (Cat) Saint-Croix
University of Minnesota
Richmond Thomason
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Degrees of Assertability.Sam Carter - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (1):19-49.
Consequences of Comparability.Cian Dorr, Jacob M. Nebel & Jake Zuehl - 2021 - Philosophical Perspectives 35 (1):70-98.
Deontic Logic and Natural Language.Fabrizio Cariani - forthcoming - In Dov Gabbay, Ron van der Meyden, John Horty, Xavier Parent & Leandert van der Torre (eds.), The Handbook of Deontic Logic (Vol. II). College Publications.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references