Some problems with environmental economics

Environmental Ethics 10 (1):55-74 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I criticize the contigent valuation method in resource economics and the concepts of utility and efficiency upon which it is based. I consider an example of this method and argue that it cannot-as it pretends-substitute for public education and political deliberation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Economics, Ethics, and Long-Term Environmental Damages.Clive L. Spash - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (2):117-132.
Nature versus the state? Markets, states, and environmental protection.Albert Weale - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2-3):153-170.
Missing the forest for the trees: justice and environmental economics.Steve Vanderheiden - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):51-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#160,779)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Beyond welfare economics: some methodological issues.Giuseppe Munda - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):185-202.
The not so worldly philosophers: Why mainstream economics can't be green.Robert Nadeau - 2010 - Synesis: A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics, and Policy 1 (1):T3 - T10.
Ethics in Wildlife Management: What Price?John A. Curtis - 2002 - Environmental Values 11 (2):145-161.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references