Erkenntnis 82 (4):913-928 (2017)

Authors
Gil Sagi
University of Haifa
Abstract
Contextualist theories of truth appeal to context to solve the liar paradox: different stages of reasoning occur in different contexts, and so the contradiction is dispelled. The word ‘true’ is relativized by the contextualists to contexts of use. This paper shows that contextualist approaches to the liar are committed to a form of semantic relativism: that the truth value of some sentences depends on the context of assessment, as well as the context of use. In particular, it is shown how Simmons’s and Glanzberg’s contextualist approaches entail relativism. In both cases, the liar sentence gets different semantic evaluations as uttered in a fixed context of use but assessed from different contexts. Shift in context of use alone cannot provide the full explanation of the liar. These contextualist approaches, as originally presented, were thus mischaracterised and they should be re-evaluated according to their full implications.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-016-9850-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,291
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Scorekeeping in a Language Game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - Syntax and Semantics (New York Academic Press) 9:315-332.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 179.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Liar Without Relativism.Poppy Mankowitz - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-22.
On Beall’s New Interpretation of $$WK_{3}$$ W K 3.Nissim Francez - 2019 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 28 (1):1-7.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-11-04

Total views
57 ( #201,395 of 2,518,749 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,151 of 2,518,749 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes